Are the pounds actually going down?
1988-2024Short answer: yes, but not the way the headline number claims. Within a fixed set of chemicals, releases fell about 84% across the 1990s. Then in 1998 the EPA folded metal mining and electric utilities into the program, and the reported total more than quadrupled overnight - not because more was dumped, but because more was counted. The line below is really two lines. Read each era on its own.
Down about 84%. The original manufacturing chemicals - solvents, acids, metals from factories - dropped from 18.7B to 2.9B pounds as plants cut solvent use and switched processes. This is the real, uncontested decline.
Down about 55% from the post-1998 peak, then flat. The bigger, mining-inclusive total fell through the 2000s and has hovered near 3.3B pounds for a decade. Progress stalled; it did not reverse.
Where the pounds land
By state, RY 2024Here is the map the title promises: every state shaded by the total pounds released inside it in a single year. It is a raw count, not a rate, so the darkest states are simply the ones moving the most weight - and the map is blunt about why. A handful of Western mining states run away with it, because crushing and processing ore displaces enormous tonnages of metal-bearing rock that count as releases. The next section pulls those two ideas apart; the table below adds a per-person column so no small state hides behind Texas.
- 01 Alaska 842M
- 02 Texas 281M
- 03 Utah 248M
- 04 Nevada 162M
- 05 Louisiana 127M
Every state, in a table
| State | Total lbs | Lbs / person | Facilities | Largest chemical | Since ’88 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alaska AK | 842M | 1147.8 | 48 | Zinc compounds | → flat |
| Texas TX | 281M | 9.3 | 1,950 | Hydrogen sulfide | → flat |
| Utah UT | 248M | 73.5 | 219 | Lead And Lead Compounds | → flat |
| Nevada NV | 162M | 51 | 145 | Arsenic compounds | → flat |
| Louisiana LA | 127M | 27.7 | 395 | Ammonia | → flat |
| Arizona AZ | 118M | 16 | 309 | Zinc compounds | → flat |
| Indiana IN | 115M | 16.8 | 885 | Manganese And Manganese Compounds | → flat |
| Ohio OH | 86M | 7.4 | 1,269 | Zinc compounds | → flat |
| Alabama AL | 83M | 16.4 | 558 | Methanol | → flat |
| Tennessee TN | 76M | 10.8 | 630 | Zinc compounds | → flat |
| Arkansas AR | 76M | 25 | 351 | Methanol | → flat |
| Michigan MI | 61M | 6.1 | 769 | Asbestos (friable) | → flat |
| North Dakota ND | 59M | 76.2 | 89 | Ammonia | → flat |
| North Carolina NC | 56M | 5.3 | 780 | Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) | → flat |
| Illinois IL | 54M | 4.3 | 942 | Copper | → flat |
| Missouri MO | 53M | 8.6 | 517 | Lead And Lead Compounds | → flat |
| Georgia GA | 53M | 4.8 | 724 | Ammonia | → flat |
| Idaho ID | 51M | 26.2 | 129 | Manganese And Manganese Compounds | → flat |
| Mississippi MS | 50M | 17.1 | 318 | Manganese compounds | → flat |
| New Mexico NM | 49M | 23 | 94 | Hydrogen sulfide | → flat |
| Florida FL | 43M | 1.9 | 758 | Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) | → flat |
| Pennsylvania PA | 42M | 3.3 | 1,044 | Zinc compounds | → flat |
| Montana MT | 42M | 37.1 | 61 | Manganese And Manganese Compounds | → flat |
| Kentucky KY | 41M | 9.2 | 405 | Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) | → flat |
| California CA | 36M | 0.9 | 1,072 | Asbestos (friable) | → flat |
| Oklahoma OK | 36M | 8.9 | 382 | Ammonia | → flat |
| Iowa IA | 35M | 10.9 | 463 | Ammonia | → flat |
| South Carolina SC | 35M | 6.6 | 564 | Methanol | → flat |
| Virginia VA | 31M | 3.6 | 410 | Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) | → flat |
| Colorado CO | 28M | 4.8 | 261 | Lead compounds | → flat |
| Oregon OR | 24M | 5.6 | 274 | Ammonia | → flat |
| Kansas KS | 22M | 7.6 | 318 | Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) | → flat |
| Minnesota MN | 22M | 3.9 | 489 | Barium And Barium Compounds | → flat |
| Wisconsin WI | 21M | 3.6 | 847 | Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) | → flat |
| West Virginia WV | 19M | 10.5 | 167 | Sulfuric acid (acid aerosols including mists, vapors, gas, fog, and other airborne forms of any particle size) | → flat |
| Wyoming WY | 19M | 32.2 | 62 | Barium And Barium Compounds | → flat |
| Nebraska NE | 18M | 9 | 200 | Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) | → flat |
| Washington WA | 16M | 2.1 | 300 | Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) | → flat |
| New York NY | 14M | 0.7 | 542 | Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) | → flat |
| New Jersey NJ | 10M | 1.1 | 329 | Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) | → flat |
| Maine ME | 7M | 5.2 | 69 | Zinc compounds | → flat |
| South Dakota SD | 7M | 7.8 | 113 | Lead And Lead Compounds | → flat |
| Delaware DE | 6M | 5.5 | 51 | Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) | → flat |
| Massachusetts MA | 5M | 0.6 | 357 | Methanol | → flat |
| Maryland MD | 3M | 0.5 | 162 | Methanol | → flat |
| Puerto Rico PR | 3M | 0.8 | 104 | Sulfuric acid (acid aerosols including mists, vapors, gas, fog, and other airborne forms of any particle size) | → flat |
| Hawaii HI | 2M | 1.5 | 36 | Sulfuric acid (acid aerosols including mists, vapors, gas, fog, and other airborne forms of any particle size) | → flat |
| Connecticut CT | 2M | 0.6 | 252 | Copper compounds | → flat |
| Rhode Island RI | 1M | 0.6 | 80 | Ammonia | → flat |
| New Hampshire NH | 0M | 0.3 | 113 | Copper | → flat |
| Vermont VT | 0M | 0.5 | 36 | Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) | → flat |
| GU GU | 0M | 0 | 9 | Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) | → flat |
| AS AS | 0M | 0 | 1 | Ammonia | → flat |
| District of Columbia DC | 0M | 0 | 10 | Manganese And Manganese Compounds | → flat |
| VI VI | 0M | 0 | 5 | Xylene (mixed isomers) | → flat |
| MP MP | 0M | 0 | 4 | Toluene | → flat |
EPA TRI, RY 2024. Total lbs sums on-site (field 65) and off-site (field 88) releases for every facility reporting in the state; per person divides by state population (a committed Census lookup). Computed by the FAC_STATE rollup in build-data.ts.
Two ways to be a heavy state
By state, RY 2024The map answers “where are the pounds?” It does not answer “where is it worst to live?” Those come apart. Plot each state by its total pounds (across) against its pounds per resident (up), both on log scales, and the states split into two families: a thin, sparsely-peopled mining West that runs high on both axes, and a heavily-industrial bottom-right - Texas, California - with giant totals but unremarkable per-person loads.
Big totals, ordinary intensity. Texas and California post some of the largest raw totals in the country, yet sit near or below the national per-person line: the load is spread across tens of millions of people and thousands of plants.
The mining West. Alaska, Nevada, Wyoming, Montana - small populations, a few enormous ore operations, and a per-person figure that runs into the hundreds of pounds. High volume and high intensity at once.
The states this chart singles out
| State | Total lbs | Lbs / person | Largest sector |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alaska | 842M | 1147.8 | Metal Mining |
| Utah | 248M | 73.5 | Metal Mining |
| Nevada | 162M | 51 | Metal Mining |
| Montana | 42M | 37.1 | Metal Mining |
| Wyoming | 19M | 32.2 | Chemicals |
| Indiana | 115M | 16.8 | Primary Metals |
| Texas | 281M | 9.3 | Natural Gas Processing |
| California | 36M | 0.9 | Hazardous Waste |
| New York | 14M | 0.7 | Primary Metals |
The counties carrying the load
Top 12 · RY 2024Zoom from the state to the county and the concentration gets starker still. One Alaskan borough - home to a single zinc mine - out-releases most entire states. Each bar is one county; the list underneath names its biggest single reporting facility, the plant doing most of the moving.
- 01 NORTHWEST ARCTIC BOROUGH County, AK · RED DOG OPERATIONS 724M lbs · 2 facilities · Zinc compounds
- 02 SALT LAKE County, UT · KENNECOTT UTAH COPPER MINE CONCENTRATORS & POWER PLANT 215M lbs · 63 facilities · Lead And Lead Compounds
- 03 GILA County, AZ · ASARCO LLC RAY COMPLEX/ HAYDEN SMELTER & CONCENTRATOR 96M lbs · 5 facilities · Zinc compounds
- 04 JUNEAU CITY AND BOROUGH County, AK · HECLA GREENS CREEK MINING CO 90M lbs · 3 facilities · Barium compounds (except for barium sulfate (CAS No. 7727-43-7))
- 05 CRANE County, TX · MIDWAY GAS PLANT 73M lbs · 2 facilities · Hydrogen sulfide
- 06 ELKO County, NV · NEVADA GOLD MINES LLC - GOLDSTRIKE MINES INC 52M lbs · 7 facilities · Arsenic compounds
- 07 HARRIS County, TX · TM DEER PARK SERVICES LP 45M lbs · 361 facilities · Methanol
- 08 CLARK County, AR · ELEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS LLC 40M lbs · 5 facilities · Cyanide compounds
- 09 MERCER County, ND · BASIN ELECTRIC ANTELOPE VALLEY STATION 35M lbs · 3 facilities · Ammonia
- 10 LAKE County, IN · USS GARY WORKS 33M lbs · 44 facilities · Manganese And Manganese Compounds
- 11 SILVER BOW County, MT · MONTANA RESOURCES LLC 32M lbs · 5 facilities · Manganese And Manganese Compounds
- 12 LEA County, NM · EUNICE GAS PLANT 29M lbs · 13 facilities · Hydrogen sulfide
EPA TRI, RY 2024. Counties ranked by total release pounds (on + off site) summed across every reporting facility, via the COUNTY + ST group-by in build-data.ts. Each row’s named plant is the largest single emitter in that county.
Who is doing the releasing
By sector, RY 2024One sector towers over the rest. Metal mining alone accounts for close to half the national poundage - and almost none of it leaves the site. Where each industry’s pounds end up is the tell: mining keeps roughly 98% on its own land, while electric utilities put more than half of theirs into the air. The deep bar is what stays on-site; the pale tail is what is shipped elsewhere for disposal.
Every sector, in a table
| Sector | Total lbs | On-site | Off-site | To air | Facilities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metal Mining | 1.35B | 100% | 0% | 0% | 89 |
| Chemicals | 446M | 86% | 14% | 38% | 3,399 |
| Primary Metals | 345M | 52% | 48% | 5% | 1,380 |
| Hazardous Waste | 205M | 86% | 14% | 0% | 219 |
| Electric Utilities | 191M | 81% | 19% | 24% | 395 |
| Natural Gas Processing | 160M | 77% | 23% | 3% | 326 |
| Food | 152M | 91% | 9% | 31% | 1,676 |
| Paper | 134M | 96% | 4% | 73% | 312 |
| Petroleum | 86M | 88% | 12% | 46% | 800 |
| Fabricated Metals | 40M | 36% | 64% | 35% | 2,838 |
| Plastics and Rubber | 36M | 79% | 21% | 79% | 1,253 |
| Other | 35M | 80% | 20% | 4% | 539 |
| Transportation Equipment | 33M | 71% | 29% | 70% | 1,319 |
| Nonmetallic Mineral Product | 26M | 79% | 21% | 66% | 2,629 |
| Electrical Equipment | 11M | 13% | 87% | 13% | 464 |
| Wood Products | 10M | 94% | 6% | 89% | 689 |
| Computers and Electronic Products | 7M | 32% | 68% | 16% | 572 |
| Miscellaneous Manufacturing | 6M | 32% | 68% | 32% | 303 |
| Machinery | 6M | 16% | 84% | 16% | 949 |
| Chemical Wholesalers | 5M | 15% | 85% | 15% | 415 |
| Beverages | 3M | 83% | 17% | 22% | 58 |
| Furniture | 3M | 94% | 6% | 94% | 141 |
| Petroleum Bulk Terminals | 2M | 82% | 18% | 81% | 516 |
| Coal Mining | 2M | 100% | 0% | 1% | 20 |
| Textiles | 2M | 94% | 6% | 44% | 71 |
| Leather | 1M | 6% | 94% | 6% | 15 |
| Printing | 1M | 83% | 17% | 83% | 78 |
| Tobacco | 1M | 53% | 47% | 52% | 23 |
| Textile Product | 0M | 54% | 46% | 53% | 26 |
| Publishing | 0M | % | % | 0% | 1 |
EPA TRI, RY 2024. Bars sum on-site (field 65) and off-site (field 88) release pounds per INDUSTRY SECTOR (field 23); “to air” is the fugitive + stack fraction (fields 5.1, 5.2), grouped in build-data.ts.
Sector by sector, since 2016
2016-2024The national plateau hides ten different stories moving underneath it. Coal retirements have pulled electric utilities down for a decade; mining lurches with commodity prices; food processing has crept the wrong way. Each panel is one sector’s last nine years, scaled to its own range so the shape shows - a rising line is drawn in rust.
EPA TRI, 2016-2024. Each panel is a sector’s release pounds across those years, on an independent y-scale (shape, not magnitude - magnitude is the ranked bars in Section 5). build-data.ts approximates each trajectory by weighting the real national year-over-year total by that sector’s current share; the ranked totals and every other exhibit are exact sector rollups.
Air, water, or ground?
Where the pounds go“Released” is not one thing. The same pound can go up a smokestack, down a pipe, into a deep injection well, or onto the ground and stay there. The mix is the reassurance and the catch at once: the mining tonnage that makes the map so dark is overwhelmingly land disposal kept on the mine site - while the chemicals people actually breathe are the roughly 16% that goes to the air.
- Land disposal, on-site 65% 2.12B lbs
- Air (stack + fugitive) 16% 530M lbs
- Off-site / shipped for disposal 14% 448M lbs
- Underground injection 0% 0M lbs
- Surface water discharge 6% 189M lbs
Full six-row breakdown (air split)
| Destination | Share | Pounds |
|---|---|---|
| Land disposal (on-site) | 65% | 2.12B |
| Off-site disposal / transfer to release | 14% | 448M |
| Stack (point-source) air | 12% | 384M |
| Surface water discharge | 6% | 189M |
| Fugitive (non-point) air | 4% | 146M |
| Underground injection | 0% | 0M |
EPA TRI, RY 2024. Pathways map to Form R fields: land disposal (5.5.x), stack air (5.2), off-site transfers to disposal (field 88), underground injection (5.4), fugitive air (5.1), surface water (5.3). The bar merges stack and fugitive into one air band; the table keeps them split.
What is in the pounds
Top releases by weightWeight is not danger. The heaviest releases here are mostly metal compounds from mining, inert enough that a ton of them troubles a toxicologist less than a few pounds of something sharper. Yet several of the heavy hitters also carry a carcinogen flag, or the PBT flag for toxics that climb the food chain and stay - and one entry near the bottom weighs almost nothing and matters most. The flags, not the pounds, do the real work in this table.
| Chemical | Released | Share of top releases | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zinc compounds N982 | 619M | - | |
| Lead And Lead Compounds N420 | 560M | PBT | |
| Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) N511 | 259M | - | |
| Ammonia 7664-41-7 | 170M | - | |
| Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 | 142M | - | |
| Copper And Copper Compounds N100 | 139M | - | |
| Manganese And Manganese Compounds N450 | 136M | - | |
| Methanol 67-56-1 | 121M | - | |
| Barium compounds (except for barium sulfate (CAS No. 7727-43-7)) N040 | 100M | - | |
| Barium And Barium Compounds N040 | 72M | - | |
| Manganese compounds N450 | 59M | - | |
| Arsenic compounds N020 | 58M | Carcinogen |
EPA TRI, RY 2024. Flags come straight from Form R fields: CARCINOGEN (46), PBT (47), PFAS (48); CAS# / category codes are field 40. Dioxin is reported in grams, not pounds, and is excluded from these weights.
Put two states next to each other
A no-JS side-by-side of any two states' release profiles - total pounds, per person, facilities, and direction since 1988, on a shared scale.
Methodology
Notes on the DataThe figures on this page derive from the EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Basic Data Files (RY 2024), the annual EPA program under which industrial facilities self-report the pounds of listed toxic chemicals they release. One record is a single chemical at a single facility for a single year (a Form R or Form A submission); a facility releasing ten chemicals files ten records. That is why there are roughly ~77K reports a year from about ~21K industrial facilities reporting.
Every figure here is real
Every number on this page is drawn from the real EPA TRI Basic Data Files - the full national set of roughly 3.2 million facility-chemical rows for reporting years 1987 through 2024. The national totals, the state and county rollups, the sector and chemical rankings, the release-pathway split, and the entire 1987-2024 trend are each computed directly from those rows by scripts/build-data.ts and regenerated with npm run data. The facility and mega-emitter names (Red Dog, Kennecott, Gary Works) are the genuine top emitters the data surfaces in their counties. Nothing here is a stand-in.
The 1998 break is not a trick of ours
The trend chart deliberately splits at 1998. Before that year TRI covered mainly manufacturing; in 1998 the EPA added metal mining and electric utilities, and reported national releases jumped several-fold overnight. The pounds did not actually change that day - the coverage did. Any “releases since 1987” total that ignores this compares two different universes. We draw the seam instead of smoothing over it.
Reading the charts honestly
Two views need a footnote. The volume-vs-intensity scatter puts both axes on a log scale - the states span from a few hundred thousand pounds to over half a billion, and from under a pound per person to nearly 800 - so equal distances on the page are equal ratios, not equal pounds; a dot twice as far right is roughly ten times the tonnage. And the sector-trajectory small multiples are each scaled to their own range: they compare the shape of a decade, not the size of one sector against another (size is the ranked bars in Section 5). The per-sector trajectories are the one approximation left: build-data.ts weights the real national year-over-year total by each sector’s current share rather than re-aggregating pounds per sector per year. Every other exhibit is an exact rollup of the raw rows.
What you are not seeing
TRI is self-reported and estimated: facilities calculate their own release figures, often from engineering estimates rather than direct measurement. It covers only listed chemicals from facilities above reporting thresholds - small emitters, farms, cars, and unlisted chemicals are invisible here. Pounds are not risk: a pound of a potent carcinogen and a pound of an inert compound both count as a pound, which is why the chemical flags matter. Dioxin and dioxin-like compounds are reported in grams, not pounds, and are excluded from these weights. And “released” includes permitted, regulated disposal - much of the mining tonnage is rock kept on the mine site, not a chemical spill.
Generated 2026-07-07 19:41 UTC
Source: EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Basic Data Files