Head to head
County vs Arizona vs the nationEvery figure below is measured against the same figure for the state and for the country. Where HUD suppressed the county's value, the row says so and no verdict is drawn - a missing number is not a good one.
| Measure | Yavapai County | Arizona | National | vs national |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wait for those admitted | 16 mo | 26 mo | 25 mo | lower |
| Share of extremely-low-income need met | 7.9% | 17.8% | 33.3% | lower |
| Tenant pays, per month | $370 | $418 | $452 | lower |
| HUD pays, per month | $876 | $1,159 | $1,135 | lower |
| How long households stay | 73 mo | 102 mo | 123 mo | lower |
Who lives there
- 86% elderly (62+)
- 40% disabled
- 56% female-headed
- $16,192 average household income
Compare with another county in Arizona
- Maricopa County
- Pima County
- Yuma County
- Cochise County
- Pinal County
- Coconino County
- Mohave County
- Santa Cruz County
- Navajo County
- Gila County
- Apache County
- Graham County
- All Arizona counties →
The wait is the time households who were admitted spent waiting. Everyone still on a list is absent from HUD's file entirely, so the true wait here is longer than the figure above. "Need" is extremely-low-income renter households from HUD CHAS (2017-2021 ACS); supply is the HUD Picture file (2025). Cells HUD marked -1 (missing), -4 (suppressed, fewer than 11 families) or -5 (non-reporting) are shown as "no data" and never averaged. See the methodology.
Generated 2026-07-13 02:52 UTC
Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households (2025 snapshot, 2009-2025 trend) joined to HUD CHAS 2017-2021 ACS for the eligible-household denominator