kvlak limn

Money & Accountability · USAspending · The Award Ledger

Who Gets the
Federal Money

The federal government obligates about $2.9T in prime awards a year - the contracts it signs and the assistance it hands out. The budget debate treats that as one number. It is not. It is a ledger with names on it, and the names repeat. This page reads the ledger four ways: who the dollars pool around, which agencies funnel them to a handful of firms, what they buy, and where on the map they come to rest.

$2.9T prime awards, FY2024
$0.8T contracts
$2.1T assistance
~640k distinct recipients
Source: USAspending (Award Data Archive), FY2024 (illustrative stand-in figures). Span 2008-present. Illustrative

Where the Money Lands

I · The Map

Shade each state by federal prime-award dollars per resident and the real geography appears. It is not California and Texas - they are big because they are populous. It is the contractor beltway (the District, Virginia, Maryland), where the primes keep their headquarters, and the national-lab states like New Mexico, where a single weapons or energy contract dwarfs the local economy. Nationally the rate runs about $8,657 per resident; the darkest states below sit many times above that.

Alabama: $5,490 per resident (28B total) Alaska: $8,082 per resident (5.9B total) Arizona: $4,189 per resident (31B total) Colorado: $5,172 per resident (30B total) Florida: $4,248 per resident (96B total) Georgia: $4,128 per resident (45B total) Indiana: $3,971 per resident (27B total) Kansas: $4,483 per resident (13B total) Maine: $4,643 per resident (6.5B total) Massachusetts: $5,571 per resident (39B total) Minnesota: $4,211 per resident (24B total) New Jersey: $3,656 per resident (34B total) North Carolina: $3,832 per resident (41B total) North Dakota: $4,615 per resident (3.6B total) Oklahoma: $4,500 per resident (18B total) Pennsylvania: $4,692 per resident (61B total) South Dakota: $4,222 per resident (3.8B total) Texas: $4,951 per resident (151B total) Wyoming: $4,828 per resident (2.8B total) Connecticut: $5,556 per resident (20B total) Missouri: $4,516 per resident (28B total) West Virginia: $5,000 per resident (9B total) Illinois: $4,127 per resident (52B total) New Mexico: $11,905 per resident (25B total) Arkansas: $4,333 per resident (13B total) California: $4,667 per resident (182B total) Delaware: $5,000 per resident (5B total) District of Columbia: $89,552 per resident (60B total) Hawaii: $7,143 per resident (10B total) Iowa: $4,063 per resident (13B total) Kentucky: $4,667 per resident (21B total) Maryland: $6,935 per resident (43B total) Michigan: $4,000 per resident (40B total) Mississippi: $5,172 per resident (15B total) Montana: $4,545 per resident (5B total) New Hampshire: $4,643 per resident (6.5B total) New York: $4,694 per resident (92B total) Ohio: $4,153 per resident (49B total) Oregon: $4,286 per resident (18B total) Tennessee: $4,225 per resident (30B total) Utah: $4,706 per resident (16B total) Virginia: $7,586 per resident (66B total) Washington: $4,872 per resident (38B total) Wisconsin: $3,898 per resident (23B total) Nebraska: $4,250 per resident (8.5B total) South Carolina: $3,962 per resident (21B total) Idaho: $3,947 per resident (7.5B total) Nevada: $3,750 per resident (12B total) Vermont: $4,923 per resident (3.2B total) Louisiana: $4,783 per resident (22B total) Rhode Island: $5,455 per resident (6B total)
Shade encodes prime-award dollars per resident (place-of-performance rollup, five quantile classes). Alaska and Hawaii are inset by the Albers USA projection; US territories fall outside its frame and appear only in the table.
Highest per resident
  1. 01 District of Columbia $89,552
  2. 02 New Mexico $11,905
  3. 03 Alaska $8,082
  4. 04 Virginia $7,586
  5. 05 Hawaii $7,143
Every state, in a table
State Total ($B) Per resident
District of Columbia DC 60 $89,552
New Mexico NM 25 $11,905
Alaska AK 5.9 $8,082
Virginia VA 66 $7,586
Hawaii HI 10 $7,143
Maryland MD 43 $6,935
Massachusetts MA 39 $5,571
Connecticut CT 20 $5,556
Alabama AL 28 $5,490
Rhode Island RI 6 $5,455
Colorado CO 30 $5,172
Mississippi MS 15 $5,172
West Virginia WV 9 $5,000
Delaware DE 5 $5,000
Texas TX 151 $4,951
Vermont VT 3.2 $4,923
Washington WA 38 $4,872
Wyoming WY 2.8 $4,828
Louisiana LA 22 $4,783
Utah UT 16 $4,706
New York NY 92 $4,694
Pennsylvania PA 61 $4,692
California CA 182 $4,667
Kentucky KY 21 $4,667
New Hampshire NH 6.5 $4,643
Maine ME 6.5 $4,643
North Dakota ND 3.6 $4,615
Montana MT 5 $4,545
Missouri MO 28 $4,516
Oklahoma OK 18 $4,500
Kansas KS 13 $4,483
Arkansas AR 13 $4,333
Oregon OR 18 $4,286
Nebraska NE 8.5 $4,250
Florida FL 96 $4,248
Tennessee TN 30 $4,225
South Dakota SD 3.8 $4,222
Minnesota MN 24 $4,211
Arizona AZ 31 $4,189
Ohio OH 49 $4,153
Georgia GA 45 $4,128
Illinois IL 52 $4,127
Iowa IA 13 $4,063
Michigan MI 40 $4,000
Indiana IN 27 $3,971
South Carolina SC 21 $3,962
Idaho ID 7.5 $3,947
Wisconsin WI 23 $3,898
North Carolina NC 41 $3,832
Nevada NV 12 $3,750
New Jersey NJ 34 $3,656

Illustrative rollup by primary place of performance. Per resident = state prime-award dollars divided by Census resident population (a curated population lookup, refreshed at ingest). The real swap re-runs this from the USAspending archive place-of-performance state field - see Methodology.

Big States Are Simply Big

II · Totals

Drop the per-resident lens and the ranking flips to the obvious: the largest states pull the most federal money. California alone books $182B in prime awards. That is not a scandal - it is population. Which is exactly why the map above divides by residents: raw totals track the census, per-resident dollars track the contracts.

Top twelve states by total prime awards ($B) $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 California: $182B total prime awards CA $182B Texas: $151B total prime awards TX Florida: $96B total prime awards FL New York: $92B total prime awards NY Virginia: $66B total prime awards VA Pennsylvania: $61B total prime awards PA District of Columbia: $60B total prime awards DC Illinois: $52B total prime awards IL Ohio: $49B total prime awards OH Georgia: $45B total prime awards GA Maryland: $43B total prime awards MD North Carolina: $41B total prime awards NC
Total prime-award obligations landing in each state (place-of-performance rollup), ranked highest first. Compare with the per-resident map above: the leaders here are populous, not contract-dense. Illustrative figures - see Methodology.
Top twelve, in a table
State Total ($B) Per resident
California CA 182 $4,667
Texas TX 151 $4,951
Florida FL 96 $4,248
New York NY 92 $4,694
Virginia VA 66 $7,586
Pennsylvania PA 61 $4,692
District of Columbia DC 60 $89,552
Illinois IL 52 $4,127
Ohio OH 49 $4,153
Georgia GA 45 $4,128
Maryland MD 43 $6,935
North Carolina NC 41 $3,832

The Top of the Contractor Table

III · Concentration

Of roughly $0.76T in prime contract dollars, the five largest firms alone book about 26%. Read the list and the buyer is obvious: the primes are the weapons houses, and the consultancies beneath them (Leidos, Booz Allen, SAIC) sell that same buyer its back office. This is not a market of thousands of vendors. It is a short table, and the same names sit at the top of it every year.

  1. 01
    Lockheed Martin Defense
    via Dept of Defense
    $76.0B
  2. 02
    RTX (Raytheon) Defense
    via Dept of Defense
    $36.0B
  3. 03
    General Dynamics Defense
    via Dept of Defense
    $34.0B
  4. 04
    Boeing Defense
    via Dept of Defense
    $30.0B
  5. 05
    Northrop Grumman Defense
    via Dept of Defense
    $25.0B
  6. 06
    Leidos IT & services
    via Dept of Defense
    $15.0B
  7. 07
    Huntington Ingalls Shipbuilding
    via Dept of Defense
    $13.5B
  8. 08
    Booz Allen Hamilton IT & services
    via Dept of Defense
    $13.0B
  9. 09
    BAE Systems Defense
    via Dept of Defense
    $12.0B
  10. 10
    Humana Government Business Health
    via Dept of Defense
    $11.5B
  11. 11
    L3Harris Technologies Defense
    via Dept of Defense
    $11.0B
  12. 12
    SAIC IT & services
    via Dept of Defense
    $9.5B
  13. 13
    Pfizer Health
    via Dept of Health & Human Services
    $9.0B
  14. 14
    Deloitte IT & services
    via Dept of Health & Human Services
    $8.5B
  15. 15
    McKesson Health
    via Dept of Veterans Affairs
    $8.0B

Share = percent of all FY2024 prime contract obligations. Recipients rolled up to ultimate parent. Illustrative figures - see Methodology and HANDOFF.md for the swap-point.

What the Money Buys

IV · Sectors

Split the roughly $0.76T in contract dollars by what they purchase, and the picture is unmistakably hard-power. Weapons & aircraft is the single largest bucket at 31%; add professional and IT services and health, and the top three sectors take 67% of every contract dollar. The government is, above all, a buyer of weapons and of the people who service the machine that buys them.

Prime contract dollars by sector (share of total) Weapons & aircraft: $232B (30.6% of contract dollars) Professional & IT services: $168B (22.1% of contract dollars) R&D & everything else: $110B (14.5% of contract dollars) Health & pharma: $96B (12.7% of contract dollars) Facilities & construction: $92B (12.1% of contract dollars) Ships & marine: $61B (8.0% of contract dollars)
  • Weapons & aircraft 31% Aircraft, missiles, ordnance, combat vehicles, and their RDT&E
  • Professional & IT services 22% Systems engineering, back-office IT, consulting, staffing
  • R&D & everything else 14% Basic and applied research, energy, space, and the long tail
  • Health & pharma 13% Drugs, vaccines, medical supply, managed-care administration
  • Facilities & construction 12% Base operations, real property, environmental remediation
  • Ships & marine 8% Shipbuilding, overhaul, and naval sustainment
Sector buckets are curated groupings over the archive's NAICS/PSC category field (the swap re-runs the same buckets against real category text). Share is percent of all prime contract dollars, not assistance. Illustrative - see Methodology.
Sectors, in a table
Sector Contract $ ($B) Share
Weapons & aircraft 232 30.6%
Professional & IT services 168 22.1%
R&D & everything else 110 14.5%
Health & pharma 96 12.7%
Facilities & construction 92 12.1%
Ships & marine 61 8.0%

Which Agencies Funnel, Which Spread

V · By Agency

Same dollars, sharper question: how many hands does each agency's money pass through? Energy routes most of its budget to a few national-lab operators; NASA and Treasury are nearly as top-heavy. Defense - the biggest buyer of all - actually spreads across far more names, and Veterans Affairs wider still. Size and grip are not the same thing. The dashed line is the average agency, 42% to its top five recipients.

Concentration = share of the agency's prime-award dollars going to its five largest recipients (rolled up to parent). Bars past the dashed average are shaded solid; the rest are outlined - the tag and the number carry the reading without relying on color. Illustrative.

Size Is Not Concentration

VI · Two Axes

Plot every major agency by how much it awards against how tightly it awards, and the two come apart. Health & Human Services is the largest buyer on the board yet spreads its money widely; Energy and NASA are a fraction of its size but route most of their budgets to a few national-lab and aerospace operators. Bigness and capture are different diseases - reading them on one axis hides that.

Contract-led (buys) Assistance-led (grants) Mixed
20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% $20B$50B$100B$200B$500B$1T avg 42% Total prime awards (log scale) → Top-5 concentration → Dept of Health & Human Services: $1.18T, top 5 hold 42% (assistance-led) HHS Dept of Defense: $456B, top 5 hold 33% (contract-led) DoD Dept of the Treasury: $210B, top 5 hold 58% (assistance-led) TREAS Dept of Agriculture: $205B, top 5 hold 47% (assistance-led) USDA Dept of Education: $175B, top 5 hold 34% (assistance-led) ED Dept of Veterans Affairs: $118B, top 5 hold 24% (mixed) VA Dept of Transportation: $95B, top 5 hold 41% (assistance-led) DOT Dept of Housing & Urban Development: $72B, top 5 hold 38% (assistance-led) HUD Dept of Labor: $68B, top 5 hold 44% (assistance-led) DOL Dept of Energy: $44B, top 5 hold 62% (contract-led) DOE Small Business Administration: $35B, top 5 hold 51% (assistance-led) SBA Dept of State: $30B, top 5 hold 36% (mixed) DOS Dept of Homeland Security: $28B, top 5 hold 31% (contract-led) DHS National Aeronautics & Space Admin: $22B, top 5 hold 55% (contract-led) NASA Dept of Justice: $20B, top 5 hold 33% (mixed) DOJ
x-axis is log-scaled (agency totals span from ~$20B to over $1T). The dashed line is the average agency's top-5 concentration (42%); dots above it funnel more than average, below spread wider. Illustrative figures - see Methodology.
Every agency, in a table
Agency Total Top-5 share Award lean
DOE Dept of Energy $44B 62% contract-led
TREAS Dept of the Treasury $210B 58% assistance-led
NASA National Aeronautics & Space Admin $22B 55% contract-led
SBA Small Business Administration $35B 51% assistance-led
USDA Dept of Agriculture $205B 47% assistance-led
DOL Dept of Labor $68B 44% assistance-led
HHS Dept of Health & Human Services $1.18T 42% assistance-led
DOT Dept of Transportation $95B 41% assistance-led
HUD Dept of Housing & Urban Development $72B 38% assistance-led
DOS Dept of State $30B 36% mixed
ED Dept of Education $175B 34% assistance-led
DoD Dept of Defense $456B 33% contract-led
DOJ Dept of Justice $20B 33% mixed
DHS Dept of Homeland Security $28B 31% contract-led
VA Dept of Veterans Affairs $118B 24% mixed

Buy or Grant

VII · Award Mix

Every agency does one of two things with its money: it buys (contracts) or it gives (assistance - grants, direct payments). Almost none does both. Defense, Energy and NASA sit hard against the contract wall; Education, Labor and Treasury are nearly pure assistance. Of the fifteen largest awarders, 4 are overwhelmingly buyers and 8 overwhelmingly granters - the middle is thin.

Contract-led Assistance-led Mixed
25% 50% 75% ← all assistance all contracts → DoD Dept of Defense: 92% contracts, 8% assistance 92% DOE Dept of Energy: 88% contracts, 12% assistance 88% NASA National Aeronautics & Space Admin: 82% contracts, 18% assistance 82% DHS Dept of Homeland Security: 68% contracts, 32% assistance 68% DOS Dept of State: 55% contracts, 45% assistance 55% VA Dept of Veterans Affairs: 52% contracts, 48% assistance 52% DOJ Dept of Justice: 45% contracts, 55% assistance 45% DOT Dept of Transportation: 12% contracts, 88% assistance 12% HHS Dept of Health & Human Services: 9% contracts, 91% assistance 9% HUD Dept of Housing & Urban Development: 9% contracts, 91% assistance 9% ED Dept of Education: 8% contracts, 92% assistance 8% USDA Dept of Agriculture: 7% contracts, 93% assistance 7% TREAS Dept of the Treasury: 6% contracts, 94% assistance 6% DOL Dept of Labor: 6% contracts, 94% assistance 6% SBA Small Business Administration: 5% contracts, 95% assistance 5%
Each dot is one agency at its contract share of prime awards; the rest is assistance. Sorted most-contract first. The dot sits on the full 0-100 spectrum, so its position - not a bar length - is the reading. Illustrative figures - see Methodology.
Award mix, in a table
Agency Contracts Assistance
DoD Dept of Defense 92% 8%
DOE Dept of Energy 88% 12%
NASA National Aeronautics & Space Admin 82% 18%
DHS Dept of Homeland Security 68% 32%
DOS Dept of State 55% 45%
VA Dept of Veterans Affairs 52% 48%
DOJ Dept of Justice 45% 55%
DOT Dept of Transportation 12% 88%
HHS Dept of Health & Human Services 9% 91%
HUD Dept of Housing & Urban Development 9% 91%
ED Dept of Education 8% 92%
USDA Dept of Agriculture 7% 93%
TREAS Dept of the Treasury 6% 94%
DOL Dept of Labor 6% 94%
SBA Small Business Administration 5% 95%

Contracts Hold Steady. Assistance Erupts.

VIII · Over Time

Stack the two families of award since 2008 and one of them barely moves. Contract dollars sit near $0.76T a year, war or peace - the buying machine runs at a steady idle. Assistance is the earthquake: the Recovery Act lifts it in 2009-10, then the pandemic sends it past $2.38T in 2021 alone. When people say federal spending exploded, this purple band is what they are pointing at.

Contracts Assistance (grants, direct payments)
$0T $1T $2T $3T '08'10'12'14'16'18'20'22'24 Contracts$0.76T Assistance$2.14T
Federal prime-award obligations by fiscal year, contracts and assistance stacked. The dashed line marks 2021, the pandemic-assistance peak. Illustrative figures shaped to the real historical pattern - see Methodology.

Every Dollar, and Who Holds It

IX · Distribution

Line up all ~640k prime recipients from largest to smallest and ask where the money actually sits. The top 1% - about 6,400 recipients - hold 64 cents of every dollar. The tens of thousands of small recipients in the tail split what is left. Federal spending is not a broad shower falling evenly; it is a firehose, and only a few names stand in front of it.

largest recipients the long tail →
Cumulative share of dollars (recipients ranked largest first)
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 0.11%10%100%

x-axis is log-scaled (0.1% to 100% of recipients) so the tiny, dollar-heavy head is legible.

Recipient bracketCumulative $
Top 0.1% 38%
Top 1% 64%
Top 5% 83%
Top 10% 90%
Top 25% 96%
Top 50% 99%
Top 100% 100%

Illustrative concentration shaped to real federal-award skew. The real swap computes this from the full recipient roll-up - see Methodology.

Methodology

Notes on the Data

The figures on this page derive from USAspending (Award Data Archive) (FY2024 (illustrative stand-in figures)), the federal government's public award-transparency system. USAspending publishes prime-award data by fiscal year in its Award Data Archive, split into two families: contracts (what agencies buy) and assistance (grants, direct payments, loans, and insurance). "Prime awards" are the money agencies obligate directly; the subcontracts and subgrants beneath them are a separate, thinner dataset and are not counted here.

What's real, what's a stand-in

Everything on this page is currently Illustrative: representative stand-in numbers shaped to the real structure of federal spending, so the page reads and argues correctly before a live ingest lands. They are badged Illustrative on the masthead and are never presented as real. The concentration story (a few contractors and a few states capturing most dollars), the twin assistance surges (Recovery Act, then pandemic), and the beltway-and-labs geography all match the documented pattern; the exact dollar figures do not. The swap-point is documented in the repo's HANDOFF.md and src/lib/source.ts: drop the archive files into data/raw/, run npm run data, and the same components render real numbers.

How the readings are computed

Geography is a rollup by primary place of performance, shown two ways: raw total, which tracks population, and per resident (total divided by Census resident population, a curated lookup refreshed at ingest, since the archive carries no population column). The contractor leaderboard is scoped to prime contract dollars and rolled up to each recipient's ultimate parent, so it reads as contractor concentration rather than being topped by states drawing Medicaid as assistance. Sectors fold the archive's hundreds of NAICS/PSC category codes into a handful of curated buckets, over contract dollars only. Agency concentration is the share of an agency's dollars captured by its five largest recipients; the size-versus-concentration scatter and the buy-or-grant dot plot re-read the same agency table on different axes. The distribution ranks every prime recipient largest-first and reads off cumulative dollar share.

What you're not seeing

Obligations, not outlays - this is money promised, not necessarily money spent, and de-obligations net against the totals. Place of performance is not always where the work truly happens; a contract booked to a headquarters state can fund work elsewhere. Recipient rollup is imperfect where parent linkage is missing. Subawards, tax expenditures, and most direct payments to individuals (Social Security, much of Medicare) sit outside the prime-award frame entirely - so this is "who gets the contracts and grants," not "the whole federal budget."


Generated 2026-07-06 00:00 UTC. Source: USAspending (Award Data Archive). Maturity: illustrative.