The Great Consolidation
1994 - 2024 · illustrativeIn three decades the movement lost more than half its institutions and more than doubled its members. Small charters did not close so much as fold into larger ones: fewer doors, and behind each surviving door far more people and far more money. Read the three panels together - they share a year axis, each keeps its own scale.
institutions (count) members & assets (growing)
Institutions in charcoal, members and assets in member-teal. The count line slopes down while both of the others climb - the single clearest picture of consolidation: 63% fewer credit unions holding 8x the assets. Illustrative trajectory; real shape needs a loop over the NCUA quarterly archive.
The Average Charter, Ballooning
Indexed to 1994 = 100 · illustrativeSpread the same money and members across ever fewer institutions and the typical credit union swells. Indexed to its 1994 self, the average charter now carries roughly 21x the assets and 5.8x the members it once did. Indexing both to a shared baseline lets one scale hold both lines honestly.
Average per surviving credit union, 1994 = 100
assets per credit union members per credit union
Average assets per charter climbed from $23.5M in 1994 to $504.7M - the 21x line. Average membership grew more gently, from 5,375 to 31,112 per charter. Assets outran members because deposits and loans compound faster than rosters. Illustrative.
Where Members Bank
Members / population · illustrativeLoyalty to the movement is intensely regional. In a handful of states more than three in four residents carry a membership - the legacy of company towns and statewide charters that quietly became the default place to bank. A few hours' drive away, it barely registers. Penetration counts memberships against population, so a state anchored by one dominant charter can brush past 100% as people who belong to two are counted twice.
| State | Penetration | Members | CUs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia | 113% | 9.8M | 106 |
| Alaska | 98% | 720K | 9 |
| Utah | 79% | 2.7M | 60 |
| Vermont | 73% | 470K | 20 |
| Hawaii | 70% | 1.0M | 51 |
| State | Penetration | Members | CUs |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | 15% | 1.4M | 130 |
| Delaware | 19% | 190K | 15 |
| Nevada | 20% | 620K | 15 |
| Arkansas | 20% | 610K | 42 |
| Mississippi | 21% | 610K | 68 |
A Long-Tailed Map
States by penetration · illustrativeThe map's colors, counted. Most states cluster in the 30.000000000000004-40% range - a credit union for a solid minority of residents - while a short, bright tail runs past 75% in the strongholds. Nationally, memberships equal about 38% of population, inflated by people who belong to more than one.
Number of states per 10-point penetration band
Each column counts states; its color is the choropleth band it belongs to, so the histogram and the map are one instrument read two ways. The distribution is right-skewed - a dense body of moderate-penetration states and a thin high tail (Alaska, Utah, and a statewide-charter outlier past 100%). Illustrative.
The Giants
Top 16 by assets · illustrativeConsolidation has a face, and it wears a uniform. A single institution - Navy Federal, chartered for the military - now holds more assets than the smallest several thousand credit unions combined. These sixteen names carry an outsized share of the movement's money while thousands of community charters divide the rest. Bars share one scale; the tip value is the real figure.
| # | Credit union | St | Charter | Members | Total assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Navy Federal CU Military / DoD | VA | FCU | 13.9M | |
| 2 | State Employees' CU State employees | NC | State | 2.8M | |
| 3 | PenFed CU Occupational / open | VA | FCU | 2.9M | |
| 4 | BECU Community (WA) | WA | State | 1.4M | |
| 5 | SchoolsFirst FCU Education employees | CA | FCU | 1.4M | |
| 6 | Golden 1 CU Community (CA) | CA | State | 1.1M | |
| 7 | America First CU Community / occupational | UT | FCU | 1.4M | |
| 8 | Alliant CU Occupational / digital | IL | State | 850K | |
| 9 | Mountain America CU Community (UT/ID/AZ) | UT | FCU | 1.2M | |
| 10 | Randolph-Brooks FCU Community (TX) | TX | FCU | 1.1M | |
| 11 | Suncoast CU Community (FL) | FL | State | 1.1M | |
| 12 | First Tech FCU Technology employees | CA | FCU | 720K | |
| 13 | VyStar CU Community (FL/GA) | FL | State | 940K | |
| 14 | Lake Michigan CU Community (MI/FL) | MI | State | 520K | |
| 15 | Digital FCU (DCU) Occupational / digital | MA | FCU | 1.1M | |
| 16 | ESL FCU Community (Rochester) | NY | FCU | 390K |
Total members across these 16: 32,960,000
Branch or Browser
Members per branch · illustrativeTwo ways to be big. Some giants run dense branch networks; others serve nearly as many people through an app and a call center. Alliant CU carries about 850,000 members per branch - it operates barely a single storefront - while community charters keep a branch for every few thousand. The axis is logarithmic; each gridline is a multiple, not an increment.
Members per branch, sixteen largest credit unions (log scale)
Highlighted dots are the digital-leaning charters that serve well above the set's median of 18,000 members per branch. A branchless model is not automatically better for members - it trades storefronts for rates and reach - but it is a different bet on what membership means. Illustrative branch counts.
Few Hold Most
Assets by size tier · illustrativeThe movement is profoundly bimodal. The 1% of credit unions above $10B hold 32% of all assets; the 3,330 smallest charters - 73% of institutions - split barely 9% between them. The further the curve sags below the grey line of perfect equality, the more the money pools at the top.
Cumulative share of assets vs institutions
Lorenz curve perfect equality the giants (top 1%)
| Asset tier | CUs | of all | Share of assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $10M | 910 | 20% | |
| $10M - $50M | 1,080 | 24% | |
| $50M - $250M | 1,340 | 29% | |
| $250M - $1B | 730 | 16% | |
| $1B - $10B | 470 | 10% | |
| Over $10B | 47 | 1% |
Concentration index (Gini) ≈ 0.80 on a 0-to-1 scale, where 0 is every charter equal and 1 is one charter holding everything. Illustrative.
The Mutual Dividend
Credit union vs bank · illustrativeWith no shareholders to pay, a credit union returns its margin to members as better rates - higher on what you save, lower on what you borrow. Across the board the spread runs the members' way. An estimated $22.4B flows back annually, roughly $156 per member household. Teal is the movement; clay is the banks.
What members earn
Deposit APY - higher is better
credit union bank
What members pay
Loan APR - lower is better
credit union bank
Bars within each panel share one scale, so a longer teal bar in the earn panel and a shorter teal bar in the pay panel both mean the same thing: the member comes out ahead. These are blended credit-union-vs-bank averages, not a single call-report field - illustrative stand-ins pending a real NCUA and bank-survey ingest.
Who They Serve
Charter, mission, membership · illustrativeEvery credit union is chartered around a defined field of membership - the community it is licensed to serve. The federal / state charter line splits the movement almost evenly by money but not by count, more than half of all charters carry a low-income designation, and a meaningful slice are certified to reach places the banks left behind.
Federal vs state charter, across three measures
Federal charter (FCU) State charter (FISCU)
Mission markers
Field-of-membership mix (share of institutions)
Community (geographic) · 52%Occupational / associational · 44%Multiple / other common bond · 4%
Federal charters outnumber state ones, but the two are near-even on assets - the biggest state charters are very large. More than half of all institutions carry a low-income designation even as the giants dominate the balance sheet: the cooperative mandate and the scale reality share the same movement. Illustrative.